Pumpdown Log Analyzer

Paste time–pressure logs from your vacuum gauge to estimate S/V or effective pumping speed from the early exponential region, and to approximate gas load Q_total in later regions.

Calculator

Paste measured pumpdown data (time vs pressure), then fit the early exponential decay to estimate S/V or S_eff and approximate gas load Q_total in a chosen time window.

Two columns per line: time and pressure. Separator can be comma, tab, or space. Header line is ignored automatically.

Pressure unit:
Time unit:

If volume is unknown, the tool reports only S/V from the log (slope of ln(p) vs t).

Leave blank to use all points. Use an early region where free-gas removal dominates and the curve looks exponential.

If left blank, the tool uses S_eff derived from ln(p(t)) fit when volume is known.

Leave blank to use the whole log for Q_total. Choose a later region to analyze tails.

Paste a pumpdown log to start analysis. Use the Advanced Pump Down Time Predictor tool to simulate the system with the extracted parameters.

Technical Explanation

Pumpdown ODE and Free-Gas Regime

The pressure evolution in a pumped chamber can be written as V·dp/dt = Q_total − S_eff·p, where V is volume, p pressure, S_eff the effective pumping speed, and Q_total the total gas load (leaks, permeation, outgassing, etc.). When Q_total ≈ 0, the early pumpdown is dominated by removal of free gas and the solution becomes:

p(t) ≈ p₀ · exp [ −(S_eff / V) · t ]

Taking the natural logarithm gives ln p(t) ≈ ln p₀ − (S_eff / V)·t. On a ln(p) vs t plot, the slope in the free-gas region is therefore −S_eff/V.

Estimating S/V and S_eff from Data

This tool performs a linear regression of ln(p) versus time over a user-specified window. The fitted slope d(ln p)/dt gives an estimate of −S/V in that region. If chamber volume V is known, S_eff can be obtained from S_eff ≈ −(d(ln p)/dt)·V. If V is unknown, the result still provides S/V, which is useful for comparing different tools or monitoring changes over time.

Approximating Gas Load Q_total

For a chosen time window, the instantaneous total gas load can be approximated as Q_total(t) ≈ V·dp/dt + S_eff·p. Using finite differences for dp/dt and an estimate of S_eff, the tool reports an average Q_total over the selected region. A region near the tail of the pumpdown curve often reflects leakage and outgassing rather than free-gas removal.

Practical Use & Limitations

Fitted S/V and Q_total values depend strongly on which part of the curve is selected and on measurement noise. Early-time data is best for estimating S/V, while late-time segments are better for characterizing leaks and outgassing. Always interpret results together with knowledge of the system (pump curve, conductance, materials) and repeat measurements where possible.

Engineering Guide

Why this calculation matters

Measured pumpdown logs reveal real S_eff and gas load without disassembling the pump. Comparing pre- vs post-PM logs quantifies valve or trap degradation.

In semiconductor equipment work: Foreline PM validation, detecting partially closed valves, estimating Q_total during outgassing tail, benchmarking against pumpdown predictor inputs.

Input parameters

Log data (t, p)
Time and pressure pairs; CSV or paste.
Chamber volume V
For S_eff = (S/V)·V from ln(p) fit slope.
Fit windows
Time ranges for ln(p) linear region and Q estimation.

Output interpretation

S/V and S_eff
From ln(p) vs t linear fit in early regime.
Q_total(t)
V·dp/dt + S_eff·p in later window.

S_eff drop after PM points to valve, trap, or line restriction—not always the pump. Rising Q_total in tail confirms outgassing-dominated slowdown.

Assumptions

  • Well-mixed volume; ln(p) linear when Q ≪ S·p.
  • Finite-difference dp/dt on logged data.
  • Constant S_eff within each analysis window.

Limitations

  • Noisy gauges distort dp/dt — smooth or widen window if needed.
  • Mixed regimes in one window skew fit.
  • Volume uncertainty directly scales S_eff error.

Worked example

Post-PM S_eff collapse — V = 200 L

  1. Fit ln(p) vs t from 60–300 s → S_eff ≈ 3 L/s vs 45 L/s pre-PM.
  2. Q_total window 300–600 s → ~2e-6 Torr·L/s combined load.
  3. Action: inspect gate valve position and foreline trap before replacing turbo.